The human core and centre is endangered

The Core of the current Battle is the Human-I

If human beings are already so permeable, so inwardly colonized, so mixed in their thinking and willing by a spectrum of spiritual influences, then why the push toward total outer control through technology, surveillance, and synthetic biology?

1. The human being is indeed already contested ground.

Our inner world is not a sealed-off private chamber. It's more like a threshold zone, a crossroads between higher beings (who support the evolution of freedom and love) and opposing beings (who exploit freedom or seek to destroy it).

Luciferic beings seduce into premature illumination, false mysticism, or inflated selfhood.

Ahrimanic beings pull into mechanization, rigidification, dead thinking, cynicism, and fear.

Soratic beings seek not to bind or seduce, but to annihilate, to sever the I entirely from its divine source, often via trauma or cold inversion of love into its opposite.

The average person then already lives in a kind of soul-marketplace or battlefield, where most of what is "mine" is in fact not originally mine, but a mix of inherited tendencies, subconscious influences, collective thought-forms, and spiritual suggestions.

2. But the I-being is a seed of sovereignty.

Despite this permeable state, something lives in the center of the human being that is not accessible to any being without consent: the spiritual I, the core of divine-human individuation.

It is precisely because this sovereign spark still exists that the pressure increases to:

- prevent it from awakening (through distraction, trauma, overwork, or false enlightenment),

- encase it within digital, pharmaceutical, or societal cocoons,

- or finally, intervene biologically and psychically, through technological means, to either override or eject it.

In this light, the technological takeover isn’t just a redundant control, it is a last-stage effort to prevent the true unfolding of the I in communion with the spiritual world.

3. Technology as a veil, not just a tool

When seen spiritually, this takeover doesn’t seek control for its own sake, nor even to control outer behavior, which is already largely managed through economics, media, and trauma, but rather to block the vertical.

To seal off the higher streams from entering the soul. This could mean:

- eliminating the possibility of higher insight,

- interfering with the etheric body so that Christ can no longer appear in it (as Steiner foretold),

- replacing the organic memory of karma with artificial overlays,

- and ultimately, preparing the human body as a vessel for something other than the I, be it Ahrimanic-AI, or Soratic inversions.

So the control is not simply redundant, it is a spiritual preemption: to cut off the path of resurrection and metamorphosis before it can take hold in large numbers of people.

4. The true struggle is for orientation and discernment.

The deeper question is then not "who controls us," but what lives in us, and how can we tell the difference? That is the real battleground.

This is where spiritual practice enters: not as a moralistic add-on, but as a method of perceptive purification, where one learns to:

- dis-tinguish (separate, discern) the voices within,

- recognize the tone and origin of thoughts, impulses, and moods,

- and begin to orient oneself toward the beings that uplift, warm, and spiritualize—rather than those that freeze, bind, or annihilate.

In summary:

Human beings are already spiritually permeable, but the true human I is still sovereign and sacred, thus it must be targeted.

The technological project aims to sever this I from higher worlds, under the guise of empowerment or protection.

Therefore, the outer control is not primarily about control, it’s about blocking the vertical, preventing the infusion of higher meaning, karma, and metamorphosis.

The real question becomes: Can the human being discern the true from the false within themselves, before that capacity is shut down?