Remote Viewing

Remote viewing is absolutely possible, although, not as envisioned here, in the cognitive context held by the CIA as mentioned in this clip. Not that it is less fantastic, or that it needs to be tuned down, as is usually the case, on the contrary.
But how it actually functions cannot be grasped in the so-called scientific context such as the one held by the CIA. While what usually is envisioned, is a simplistic materialistic interpretation, namely: remote viewing would be like seeing through some looking-glass, telescope, or through some window afar. Of course, it is tempting to view it that way, as this is how things would function in the physical sense. Merely assuming it would be the same in the inner spiritual realm, would come down to materializing the spiritual realm.. But it doesn’t work that way, and therefore it has be envisioned differently, to come to a view of how it actually does work.

This can then only be "explained" and even literally be looked at, with spiritual science, where indeed performing remote viewing becomes possible. And such remote viewing should indeed happen more and more, as it is fairly simple.

One thing has to be kept in mind though, is that the inner and outer worlds function in very different ways. The outer world is indeed a three dimensional world, where to go somewhere, a distance has to be crossed. But not so in the inner world. There length, height and depth don’t exist of course in a physical sense, as all physicality and materiality are absent from the inner world. There in this inner world, everything presents itself in a different way.

There, thoughts can come and go, some can indeed even morph into others. The inner world presents itself as a fluctuating world, where it is not always easy to see, how a thought arises, and how it disappears, or whereto. This very different character of the inner world has to be well taken into consideration. In the inner world, and more so at certain times of the year, thoughts can be rolling in like an endless, and more or less meaningfully stream. At others, thought can be more clear, sharp, and defined.

Now, how does something pops into one’s head? Sometimes this is meaningless, and seems to be happening by itself, more like a kind of clutter, even a little chaotically. At other times, it can be extremely meaningful, as some long awaited idea or insight might pop into one’s mind. yet again in other cases, hereby a kind of premonition happens, or, one things of somebody, and indeed it does have meaning. Sometimes relatives who are dead all of a sudden pop into our mind, like at out of the blue. And in some case one could indeed say that this happens through certain associations: one sees something, and pop, this makes one think of someone. Thus indeed it can happen through mere associations, that one thinks of something, or that something pops into one’s mind —which is somehow the same thing, although there is a distinction, even crucial one, but for now we’ll say it’s the same thing— thus for instance by having seen something that makes one think of something.

Yet even in these cases —not always, but possibly— when one looks at it, by calling it up again into one’s mind, how one say was “attracted” or led to look at something perhaps, precisely to make that idea pop into one’s mind, then one can get a sense that there is more to it, namely more to being led to notice this or that. Would one now see into the etheric-astral worlds, one would of course see how this seemingly casual looking at something, was in fact brought about by those presences, benevolent or malevolent, in these spaces.

But of course, to notice these things at all, unless there is already such a disposition —through perhaps some previous work in one time, or form or the other— the mind needs to be strengthened a little, so as to give it more density, so that the fluctuation and ephemeral character of the world that is otherwise not really being treaded, is a little overcome, and that more hold comes about, to better notice, in general, but also to hold on better to ideas that sometimes come, and who might disappear immediately, even before they were properly noticed.

Now this is a kind of prelude, or introduction, to start getting at what this “remote viewing” actually is. While if some people may require a kind of training to be able to do so, others might already be having these capacities.

But in this schooling, a distinction needs to be made between what is fantastic, thus fantasy, randomness, arbitrariness, etc, and that which is actually lawful, and really pertaining to reality. Therefore does this schooling consists at the same time in a strengthening of thinking, of thought, and on an education of thought, so as to train it to match reality as it is observable.

Perception and thinking are both in a way will activities, yet at the same time also perceptual activities, thus in a way more receptive-passive. One can look at something, say a tree, and immediately the thought tree is there. Now in science it is believed that the thought ”tree” appears because of a certain inner mechanism, where perhaps all perceptions are stored and classified with a label attached to them, namely a name. Thus the inner representation holds the tag, the word “tree” attached to it.

Because of course, otherwise there wouldn’t be any other explanation or option, unless one started to take the inner world seriously, by considering it a reality in itself, although a different one than the physical reality. So science envisions a librarian, at work in the inner world. But it is something else at work. To envision what that could be, thoughts have to be taken for realities, as things in themselves, that exist somewhere, where however to three dimensions exist, and where physical form and matter are upheld.

So thought —and other things in that realm— exist in themselves in this inner, invisible spiritual world. Now, one thinks this inner world —where perhaps thoughts are stored— to exist into one’s head, kind of with stored imprints of the outer world. This of course, is a way of envisioning the functioning of the inner world, not according to its own specific way of functioning, and based on its special character, but according to how things happen in the outside, physical world.

It is of course a HUGE step for human beings to envision that thoughts might actually also exist IN the things themselves, namely in the visible things in the physical world. And indeed that they could perhaps be an actual reflection of something existing in things of the world, that is not visible with the senses, but only with this other perceptual organ, that is the cognitive organ. While perhaps thinking would in some way, and in some aspect, be an organ of perception. An organ, which in this case doesn’t perceive the physical aspect, but a hidden spiritual aspect, which has somehow withdrawn out of sight during previous stages of world evolution, so to speak.

While what if the inner human being was still in connection with the “interiority” of the world? Namely a spiritual interiority. He is himself proof that a spiritual interiority can exist within the physical context. He himself holds an interiority almost withdrawn out of view to himself. No wonder then that he can’t discern the interiority of the world, the more so that his own interiority has almost entirely withdrawn out of sight. His own interiority and that of the world are one and the same, although within the human being it has slightly individualized.

But if sciences can formulated the laws that govern the world, by discerning the active principles active within the world, it is because human beings do perceive this lawfulness and these principles, and formulate them in cognitive form. If it can be translated numerically, or in any other form, it is because the actual substrate, on which knowledge, thoughts, and active principles exist, is one and the same..

This means that thinking, is on one end an extracting of what exists in thought-form within the things of the world. An exercise can make this tangible: place a pencil before you, or take it in your hand, whatever, and observe the pencil very well. Do so for a few minutes. Notice how difficult it is to remain with one’s attention focussed on the object. But try really to remain focussed, and don’t drift off to other thoughts and other considerations. Parallel to this “observation exercise,” try to remain focussed in thought, by translating what you see in thought form. Describe to yourself what you see. Every line, every bump, keep thought as close as possible to what is seen (of the pencil).

When you practice this repeatedly, you’ll notice that at some point you’ll “think the actual thoughts” within the pencil. Thinking and perceiving are then one and the same thing. You’ll sort of enter into a field where all the “thought elements” pertaining to the object —here a pencil, but it can be anything— can be found, including anything related to its fabrication, even the people involved with its fabrication. Now all this becomes visible. Hence, here we have arrived at Remote Viewing..

And this can also be further expanded towards the grasping of say the quantum fields and such phenomena as entanglements. While the quantum fields, scientifically grasped, are only mere speculations, while to actually look at the nature and substrate of these fields, we have to follow a similar path as outlined here.

But then of course much more becomes visible as well.