I. The Fragmented Structure of Modern Consciousness

Modern consciousness tends to function in fragments.

One thought follows another.
One emotion replaces the previous one.
One impulse interrupts the last.

If we diagram it schematically, it often resembles:

A + B + C + D + E …

Each element stands next to the other, but remains separate.

We move from one inner “item” to the next.

This produces a form of consciousness that is:

  • discontinuous
  • reactive
  • mineralized
  • an-organic

Even when the content is emotional or intense, the structure remains fragmented.

This is what might be called dead thinking — not because it lacks activity, but because its elements do not live in continuity.


II. Organic Consciousness as Movement

A living form of consciousness is structured differently.

It is not:

A + B + C + D

but rather:

AxBxCxD

The elements are not isolated.
They interpenetrate.

They unfold.

They carry one another.

Instead of stepping from one point to the next, consciousness inhabits a movement.

This movement has:

  • a beginning
  • a middle
  • an end

And the “I” remains present throughout the duration.

This continuity is decisive.

It is the difference between sequence and flow.


III. The “I” and the Activation of Movement

Usually, consciousness jumps from inner item to inner item:

  • thought to thought
  • emotion to emotion
  • impulse to impulse
  • or between a mix of these

But the “I” can do something else.

It can enter movement itself, and even more, it can create/initiate movement.

This is not merely participation.
It is not merely reaction.

It is living in and activating movement.

When the “I” enters movement:

  • the body can become more animated
  • rhythm can become intentional
  • perception can stretch
  • tempo can be modulated

Even the slightest motion — left/right, forward/back, slow/fast — can be intensified through conscious in-habitation.

The difference is not speed.

The difference is continuity of presence.


IV. E-motion and I-Motion

Emotion is being moved.

I-motion is moving from the center.

Modern culture is saturated with emotion.
It is far less acquainted with I-motion.

To live in movement means:

  • not being carried away
  • not suppressing intensity
  • not fragmenting into inner items

But remaining present across the arc of movement.

This presence can inhabit:

  • stillness
  • acceleration
  • restraint
  • force

Without losing center, or presence.


V. The Range of Movement

Living movement is not one tone.

It includes:

  • fast and slow
  • intensity and quiet
  • contraction and expansion
  • weight and lightness

The mature “I” is not confined to one register.

It can inhabit the full spectrum deliberately.

Where this capacity is absent, civilization oscillates:

  • mechanical acceleration
  • emotional turbulence

Where it is present, modulation becomes possible.


VI. Movement Beyond the Physical

Movement need not remain confined to muscular activity.

Inner movement — of thought, of attention, of perception — can also become continuous.

Thinking itself can unfold as movement rather than as a chain of disconnected concepts.

When this occurs, consciousness breathes.

The “I” does not disappear.

It remains present across duration.

This continuity is not mystical.

It is experiential.


VII. Why This Matters Now

Modern civilization possesses immense outer power.

At the same time, inner life is increasingly volatile.

Both share a common structural issue:

Fragmentation.

Without continuity of presence, power becomes mechanical and emotion becomes chaotic.

Living movement restores integration.

Not by suppressing force.
Not by dissolving identity.

But by inhabiting duration intentionally.


VIII. A Simple Experiment

Walk slowly for several minutes.

Instead of moving from step to step mechanically, remain inwardly present across the entire arc of the walk.

Let the movement become one continuous gesture.

Notice the difference between fragmented stepping and living continuity.

This is not performance.

It is training continuity of presence.


IX. Toward a Culture of Living Movement

The future may not depend on increased control or emotional intensity.

It may depend on whether consciousness can become organic.

From E-motion to I-motion.

From fragmentation to continuity.

From sequence to living movement.

Share this post

Written by

Seeing Beyond (Philippe Lheureux)
Seeing Beyond, a research initiative focused on spiritual science, living cognition, and the threshold experiences of modern life. An initiative grounded in a spiritual-scientific approach to self- and world-observation.

Comments