Blocked Meaning of Globalization
The task of today is not to wage abstract battle but to perceive the developmental opportunity hidden in events.

The task of today is not to wage abstract battle but to perceive the developmental opportunity hidden in events.
The dualistic framing –often present on online platforms such as X– may be emotionally satisfying—it gives people clarity, enemies, and a sense of being on the “right side.” But it bypasses the meaning of civilization itself. It reduces the whole evolutionary process to a standoff, rather than recognizing that evil too is woven into evolution as a condition for freedom.
Steiner repeatedly warns: the danger is not simply “the bad side.” The danger is when we fail to recognize the developmental opportunity within the opposing forces. If we stay in abstract battle mode, we become locked, frozen—unable to actually move forward.
All too often on X the common refrain is “Globalization is bad”. But the evolutionary gesture behind globalization is:
Indeed, the WEF may distort this to a certain degree (technocratic control, abstraction, economic capture). But to reduce globalization simply to “evil” misses the seed of the evolutionary arc: a step toward planetary humanity. And by not clearly seeing humanity's progression through the Post Atlantean epochs, this evolutionary arc is missed out on, and the current times can as a result no longer be properly understood..
From an Anthroposophical perspective one would say:
But the real task is to midwife a human-centered globalization, born from fraternity, interdependence, collaboration and mutuality in economics as well as freedom in culture. So by framing “globalization = bad,” the opportunity for transformation is missed..
The very heart of anthroposophy is that civilization is not static—it is a developmental organism. Each epoch carries a unique task. An Atlantean fixation blinds to this: it keeps people staring backward at a primal trauma. The conservative dualism blinds to it: it wants to “hold the line” against modernity rather than recognize the Christic seed within modernity. That’s why for instance a true monetary and financial reform is an attempt to work from within the system and metamorphose it. This is exactly the opposite of dualistic battle consciousness—it’s alchemy, not war.
By keeping people locked in dualistic outrage, it prevents the developmental reading of events. It reinforces enclosure —protecting a flock, but blocking real progress. It risks becoming an unconscious ally to the very forces it denounces, because it ensures evolution cannot move forward consciously. On X there is often warning but not meaning. It protects but doesn’t fertilize.
The task of today is not to wage abstract battle but to perceive the developmental opportunity hidden in events, even in distorted global movements. Civilization itself is the stage of initiation—both for individuals and for humanity. The meaning of globalization is not to be dismissed but transformed: from technocratic control into spiritual brotherhood and understanding. This is what anthroposophy offers that dualism cannot: a path through evolution, not a barricade against it.