This is an esoteric perspective, a viewpoint on the great initiation of the early 21st century: the opening act of a drama where the Ahrimanic and Soratic forces appear not only separately, but in a new alliance.

1998–2001: Threshold Timeline of the New Millennium

1998: The Turning Point

  • Steiner indicated the late 20th century (around 1998) as a karmic hinge where forces would rearrange.
  • In retrospect, this was the moment before the seal broke: the financial “dot-com” euphoria, the global acceleration of digitalization, and the first shadows of a coming void.
  • Esoterically, the Soratic beings — powers of absolute negation and annihilation — began to press closer to human evolution. They become perceptible only when their masks fall.

2000: The Contested Inauguration

  • The Bush–Gore election ended in deadlock and a Supreme Court decision. Many sensed an occult displacement: the candidate of earth-consciousness (Gore, with his ecological vision) was blocked, and a dynastic, oil-military clan (Bush/Cheney) was installed.
  • In this sense, a path of Perestroika (world openness, ecological concern, post–Cold War détente) was aborted.
  • Clinton — despite his flaws — represented a more “humanized” pole, but by 2000 his influence was exhausted. Gore could have carried a different continuity, but was displaced at the very threshold.

2001: The Inauguration of Fear

  • Bush sworn in (Jan 20, 2001): With him, the archetype of the unconscious instrument — a man easily overshadowed by stronger powers around him (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz).
  • 9/11 (Sept 11, 2001):
    • The Twin Towers (Mammon’s pillars) fell in fire and dust, televised endlessly.
    • The Pentagon (earthly military might) was struck.
    • Building 7 — the hidden intelligence structure — collapsed mysteriously.
    • This triple gesture signaled the “initiation” of humanity into a new matrix of fear, control, and surveillance.

The Spiritual Forces at Work

Ahrimanic Powers

  • Calculation, surveillance, digitization, the mechanization of consciousness.
  • The Patriot Act, Homeland Security, endless war — all are Ahriman’s architecture of control.

Soratic Powers

  • The fire of annihilation, the spectacle of destruction, the initiation through trauma.
  • Unlike Ahriman, who wants to bind, the Sorat beings want to consume, to make chaos itself sovereign.
  • 9/11 as an apocalyptic sign-act belongs here: fear and spectacle of destruction become a kind of black sacrament.

Alliance of Ahriman & Sorat

  • Sorat creates the shock event (spectacle of destruction).
  • Ahriman builds the system afterward (control, digitization, endless war).
  • Humanity is caught between the two: terror from above, surveillance from below.

Political Archetypes in Contrast

  • Gorbachev / Perestroika: gesture of openness, reform, loosening karmic knots. A possible path of healing cut short.
  • Clinton: flawed but still operating with a humanized instinct, mediating between worlds.
  • Gore: bearer of ecological consciousness, arguably displaced by destiny or manipulation.
  • Bush: unconscious vessel, surrounded by initiates of power.
  • Blair: the “fiery instrument,” consumed by zeal, almost possessed — unable to resist the current.

The First Quarter of the 21st Century

From 2001 to 2025, humanity has been drawn steadily deeper into the Ahrimanic-Soratic alliance:

  • Endless wars and militarization.
  • The digitization of every aspect of life.
  • Shock events (financial crises, pandemics, environmental disasters) used ritually.
  • A culture of fear and division.

But at the same time: revelation. The Soratic beings cannot act without showing themselves. Their exposure is their weakness, and in that exposure the human I can begin to stand upright, perceiving clearly what is at stake.

Share this post

Written by

Seeing Beyond (Philippe Lheureux)
Founder of Seeing Beyond, a research initiative focused on spiritual science, living cognition, and the threshold experiences of modern life. Here we weave together field inquiry, philosophical clarity, and a reverence for the real.